Pro Hac Vice Appearances are only for out of state attorneys!

 Link to this blogpost: 

http://www.publiusroots.org/2025/03/pro-hac-vice-appearances-are-only-for.html

Ref to other blogposts has to do with Illegal Eviction 2024. 

ie:  https://motherearthtoo2022.blogspot.com/2024/10/illegal-eviction-2024.html?m=1

     That link provides more blogpost links which I created - all from a case which has NO LEGAL EFFICACY!  I PAID MY RENT!  

     They were ordered by a court to remove the fraudulent charges January 2023!  The maintenance manager took a dump in my trash can in my bathroom that same time!  An obvious and discusting way to harass me, to pile on all the other abuses to include 

      ILLEGAL ENTRIES ON A REGULAR BASIS

     STEALING FROM ME WHEN THEY ARE ILLEGALLY ENTERING

     VANDALIZING MY APARTMENT

    USING VIOLENT FORCE TO BREAK IN WHEN I WAS TAKING A BATH, SCREAMING FOR MY LIFE!  

They also disabled my washer and I have to wash clothes out by hand - and damaged my bed and I had to sleep on the concrete floor for two years!  There is more! I need to resume my work on Motions for Rectification on Transcripts, which I will upload if I am able to copy and paste the transcripts...I will see if Transcript of January 13, 2025 can be uploaded now....That is what it will be titled.  The other transcripts are shorter and will be "REMAINING TRANSCRIPTS"  as the blogpost name, if I remember what I just typed!  Can't promise anything!  They use cyber crime to trip up my work on a continuous basis!  So this is a tremendous burden, which compounds all the other traumas I have had in my life!  --3/1/2025

I am appealing and remain in my apartment AND this landlord, who uses a FRAUDULENT ATTORNEY, continues to be subsidized so their BS about my lease not being active is even more reason to dismiss the case - but I am targeted in this state!  The law hasn't mattered until they - the court officials and illegal parties - are held accountable! 

I am working on Motions For Rectification on Transcripts, which is very difficult for a number of reasons - the primary one is it is all BULLSHIT, ABUSIVE TO ME, TARGETING ME, WASTING A GREAT AMOUNT OF STATE MONEY! 

---3/1/2025

This state is allowing many attorneys to FRAUD their appearances as Pro Hac Vice! 

I am pasting the Rules of Court, from Connecticut Rules of Practice:  

(b) Any attorney who is in good standing at the bar of another state and who [has] does not [appeared] already have a pro hac vice August 13, 2024 CONNECTICUT LAW JOURNAL Page 25PB appearance in the underlying matter, may apply to participate in the presentation of an appeal. Such application shall be filed by a member of the bar of this state using form JD-CL-141, Application for Permission for Attorney to Appear Pro Hac Vice in a Court Case. [in the Superior Court to participate in the cause now pending on appeal, may for good cause shown, upon written application, on form JD-CL-141, Application for Permission for Attorney to Appear Pro Hac Vice in a Court Case, presented by a member of the bar of this state, be permitted in the discretion of the court having jurisdiction over the appeal to participate in the presentation of the appeal, provided, however, that:] [(1) s]Such application shall be accompanied by a[n] completed affidavit on form JD-CL-143, Affidavit of Attorney Seeking Permission to Appear Pro Hac Vice, and the filing fee shall be paid with the court for the application submitted pursuant to General Statutes § 52-259 (i). [(A) providing the full legal name of the applicant with contact information, including firm name, business mailing address, telephone number and email address, as applicable; (B) certifying whether such applicant has a grievance pending against him or her in any other jurisdiction, has ever been reprimanded, suspended, placed on inactive status, disbarred or otherwise disciplined, or has resigned from the practice of law and, if so, setting forth the circumstances concerning such action; (C) certifying that the applicant has paid the client security fund fee due for the calendar year in which the application is made; (D) designating the chief clerk of the Superior Court for the judicial district in which the cause originated as his or her agent upon whom process and notice of service may be served; Page 26PB CONNECTICUT LAW JOURNAL August 13, 2024 (E) certifying that the applicant agrees to register with the Statewide Grievance Committee in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 2 of the rules of practice while appearing in the appeal and for two years after the completion of the matter in which the attorney appeared and to notify the Statewide Grievance Committee of the expiration of the two year period; (F) identifying the number of cases in which the attorney has appeared pro hac vice in any court of this state since the attorney first appeared pro hac vice in this state as well as any previously assigned juris number; (G) stating the number of applications previously filed in the Superior Court pursuant to Section 2-16 and whether any of those applications were denied and the reason for that denial; (H) identifying the number of attorneys in his or her firm who are appearing pro hac vice in the cause now on appeal or who have filed or intend to file an application to appear pro hac vice in this appeal; and (2) the filing fee shall be paid with the court for the application submitted pursuant to General Statutes § 52-259 (i); and] [(3) a] A member of the bar of this state must be present at all proceedings and arguments and must sign all motions, briefs and other papers filed with the court having jurisdiction over the appeal and assume full responsibility for them and for the conduct of the appeal and of the attorney to whom such privilege is accorded. [Good cause for according such privilege may include a showing that by reason of a long-standing attorney-client relationship, predating the cause of action or subject matter of the appeal, the attorney has acquired a specialized skill or knowledge with respect to issues on appeal or to the client’s affairs that are important to the appeal, or August 13, 2024 CONNECTICUT LAW JOURNAL Page 27PB that the litigant is unable to secure the services of Connecticut counsel.] (c) Upon the granting of an application to appear pro hac vice, the clerk of the court in which the application is granted shall immediately notify the Statewide Grievance Committee of such action. [(c) No application to appear pro hac vice shall be permitted after the due date of the final reply brief as set forth in Section 67-3 or 67- 5A without leave of the court.] COMMENTARY: The purpose of these amendments is to conform the rule.....