Supplement to Objection to Terminate Stay of Execution
Link To This blogpost
Rest Assured, I will have it all scanned and a 30-day link made to share:
AC48416
NHH-CV24-6024196-S : APPELLATE COURT OF CT
ANSONIA STATE
STREET : STATE OF CONNECTICUT
V : HOUSING SESSION
ANNE M. BRADLEY : JULY 13, 2026
APPELLANT’S SUPPLEMENT
OBJECTION TO APPELLEE’S MOTION TO TERMINATE
AUTOMATIC STAY OF EXECUTION
FACTS
9. Appendix is paginated as Page 2__ with remaining of Appendix to consecutively be paginated beginning with Page 2__ - to prevent this Motion from being frauded, which is a common circumstance based on the Appellant’s experiences.
10. This supplement is to clarify a number of wrongful actions taken by the Housing Court of New Haven; namely Alayna Stone and Attorney William Pitt. Objection To Motion To Terminate has been submitted with an incomplete Appendix due to Appellant’s concern that more abuse of process will take place and Alayna Stone will deny her motion as she has done many times with other motions, not hearing them and on one occasion intercepting opportunity to submit a Memorandum of Law, since that particular motion had stated “Memorandum of Law to be submitted forthwith”. Her reason for denial was nefarious, claiming she did not have a Memorandum of Law and it SHOULD have been attached to the motion.
11. ABUSE OF PROCESS IS CONTINUOUS
a) Associated Case, AC48452/NHHCV245006875-S Docket Sheet
i. This was the first of these two cases. It is a HOUSING COMPLAINT, accepted by the housing court, entered by the housing court. The Notice to Quit was proven to be not valid. Alayna Stone’s going back and forth with orders, facts and legal malpractice of the law have been constant. She fails to correct her errors; she is removed from administering the law.
ii. Return Date was set by the chief clerk and is ILLEGAL
1. The date the case was docketed should have been the date the case was served either by US mail or marshal. Appellant told the chief clerk she was fully prepared in printing full copies of each complaint at home and wanted to mail them. Attorney Pitt would not allow her to do that. Attorney Pitt claimed they had to be served by a marshal.
a) Attorney Pitt used means of delay, which is ABUSE OF PROCESS. He took a week to allow a marshal to serve the papers. He wanted a certain marshal to serve them; Appellant said no and said enough is enough. She arranged for another marshal to serve them. Whether this was any improvement in the process is unknown, since this marshal claimed she had to give the Secretary of State $50, without citing any law requiring that. She gave the Secretary of State the original complaint - obviously why Attorney Pitt refused to hand the complaint back to the Appellant. Appellant claimed that was unlawful. The marshal claimed, “They needed two copies”. Appellant said, “Then why didn’t you give them YOUR copy? A copy for you was included. The issue of the Secretary of State enjoying the position of Agent of Service for the Bozzuto Management Company was claimed to be by Attorney Pitt that one of the Principals must have died. That was another deception by Attorney Pitt. No one died. The principals had been the same. The Secretary of State was agent of Service for at least 13 years. This was why Appellant listed a number of companies on this complaint, due to the convoluted manner of transactions, records, and other nefarious activity.
12. Complaint for this case was originally issued in September 2024, one week after an invalid Notice To Quit was crumpled in her door frame. Housing Court said she could do nothing but wait, that there was no SUMMARY PROCESS. Yet upon research she discovered that she had the right to issue a Housing Complaint/Notice of Suit IF she had NOT been served a valid Notice To Quit. Her argument was forthright and immediately referred to as reason for the Complaint. Copies were provided. An appendix of 246 pages was submitted at the time she submitted fee waiver for the case. The court accepted the Housing Complaint, granted the fee waiver, and took her payments into court - all of these issues were affirmed by the court to be the last agreed upon rent, and that the Notice To Quit was invalid.
13. The Court ordered Appellee-Plaintiff NOT to initiate a Summary Process during the proceedings of the Complaint. Appendix D.
a) The Court refused the typed Form which was prepared for approval along with the Fee waiver, which was titled as the Appellant orginally wanted it: Anne Bradley v Bozzuto Management, et al - Attorney Pitt changed the name of the case, claiming he EXPECTED a Summary Process will be initiated and he wanted the cases to match. The fact the Order on the Notice of Suit specified that they could not initiate a SUMMARY PROCESS is only one of many circumstances which housing court officials disregard rules and laws and just do whatever they want.
14. Appellees on aforesaid case are also on associated case, AC48452/NHH-CV24-5006875-S, which was the FIRST Summary Process which was docketed. Hearing of October 31 was presided by a woman in her 60’s, who impersonated Alayna Stone, which Alayna Stone took part in and never explained why this inept circumstance was allowable. Additionally, the COMPLAINT was not heard, which is a requirement of Due Process of Law. The woman impersonating Alayna Stone made every inferrance, and possibly even stated, a continuance would be in order. That did not take place as expected. Alayna Stone, who did not even preside in the hearing, ruled on the hearing, where the Complaint was not answered by ANY of the defendants and additionally were not appearing at the hearing. The young man estimated to be in his 20’s claimed HE was Attorney Peter Hoops. There was no affirmation of the parties to the case and their lack of appearances. Appellant claimed that they were not appearing. Additonally, Appellant argued that the Motion To Dismiss was prepared by an “Attorney St. Rock” yet being argued by this young man who was presumed to be “Attorney Peter Hoops”, yet he obviously was not since the real Attorney Peter Hoops entered the BAR in 1987.
15. The man who appeared on aforesaid case claimed HE was Attorney Peter Hoops. This was also discussed by the Appellant-Defendant on aforesaid case, at which time Alayna Stone would not clear up the matter to ensure the man who was there was truly Attorney Peter Hoops, who would be about 70 years of age since the record on the Juris lookup indicated he entered the BAR in 1987. This indeed was was a deliberate and criminal cover-up by the Housing Court OFFICIALS, not the clerks who serve the public the majority of the time.
16. The court failed to enter DEFAULT for any of the parties in associated case, which would include Ansonia State Street, since they failed to ANSWER the Complaint.
17. The Housing Complaint Case was rejected in September and Appellant struggled with numerous abuses, particularly cyber crime at the apartment complex she lived at, which was believed to be truly owned by the Developers who were given this property for just $1 by the City of New Haven - namely Bozzuto Management, Inc. By October 1, Appellant had completed a sufficient set of documents to be presented to the housing court.
a) Attorney Pitt once again rejected them, claiming that the addresses of the defendants were not allowed, that only Agents of Service were - which was contrary to the instructions on the form and yet the form was hand-written at that point to make sure she was no longer going to allow means of delay in processing.
i. Attorney Pitt claimed, “We have a very specific way of processing Housing Complaints and you have to follow that”
ii. Attorney Pitt also claimed as an excuse, “These Housing Complaints are very informal and the process is informal”
b) A full week of delay tactics took place after the Housing Complaint Case was approved and docketed. The Housing Court Official would not return the documents back to the Appellant so she could serve them on the Defendants, as previously stated.
i. Appellant claims that this was deliberate ABUSE OF PROCESS, in order to aid and abett Ansonia State Street, et al - since the return date of the Notice To Quit/Termination of The Lease was on or about October 18. Even though the Housing Court recognized the Notice To Quit to be invalid, allowing this Housing Complaint and allowing Payments Into Court, Alayna Stone made a complete role reversal.
1. Alayna Stone claimed that she was dismissing this case which she did not even hear because the Notice To Quit was spelled correctly. Of course it was removed, as much was in the recorded hearings. In her Memorandum of Decision on aforesaid case, she claimed the Notice To Quit was valid because it was typed and served! That is not at all what makes a legal document valid; in fact, Notice To Quit Forms are available and do not have to be typed. It is the opinion of the Appellant that all housing eviction cases should have the same requirement, that the Notice to Quit, which is bar-coded, should be used because the Housing Court Officials are known to fraud cases.
a) In fact, it is often a pleasure by court officials to fraud cases when they know they can get away with it. Appellant emphasizes her own experience with this in the illicit arrest of 6/16/2006 at the University of New Haven. The synopsis is fraudulent. The police were fraudulent. The police were deceptive, offering to take her home yet instead forced her to Yale Hospital since Yale Hospital frauded records for one of the university police who claimed he had dermatitis, describing it verbally as a dangerous infection, yet there was absolutely no marking on him and the fact that the letter and paperweight sent to Dr. Kaplan was received literally three days prior to that was another proof what he said were lies. It is common practice for them to deliberately lie to people as some kind of sport rather than actually perform their duties of law enforcement. In fact they also claimed that the alleged victim was Dr. Kaplan who did not issue any letter of complaint. They also charged the Appellant with Reckless Endangerment, simply to infer a more dangerous crime against a child, which they figured they would somehow enjoy frauding their police reports on. After being kidnapped by Yale Hospital, without any Commitment Process, Appellant was drugged one night and obviously raped by one or more men - to teach her a lesson when she used the emergency phone because a young man who said he was suicidal was responded to by the same unpleasant and unprofessional doctor, Helen Savage, that he just wanted to stay there longer because he liked the food - even though there were posted wall boarding jobs available and he was anxious to secure work. He felt imprisoned and abused and acted upon his suicidal ideations by breaking the mirror in the bathroom and slashing both of his arms and was bleeding to death in his bed. The staff delayed checking on him despite the noise. A staffer began screaming. Appellant at that point used the emergency phone and left a voicemail for a police detective she had known for quite some time and had great trust in. It was after she did that she lost consciousness, and she woke up at noon the following day, knowing she had been attacked sexually as a means to make her fearful and submissive to them. A very common tactic by organized crime!
b) The Milford Court prosecutors continued to put Lawrence Mark Hurley’s spin on the case after their longtime friend was arrested on over 100 counts of embezzlement, involving forging checks from their nefarious “Accellerated Rehabilitation Program” which was like selling illegal drugs rather than making justified plea deals. They used threats as their main tactic, despite fully knowing cases like this illicit arrest at the University of New Haven, had no merit and should have been thrown out. As one who obviously got away with stealing hundreds of thousand of dollars in just a three year period - and most likely all while he was at the Milford Court, which the judge denied further audits by the state police for, this buddy-buddy situation in the court resulted in further abuse to the Appellant, even though the case was past the statute of limitations. The court even held a trial by jury and adduced two more misdemeanors, which were the same charge - Breach Of Peace - violating the Double Jeopardy Law - yet they just simply enjoyed their buddy-buddy system as precedence to continue abusing the Appellant. Those who took part in this abuse were rewarded by this organized criminal underworld in Connecticut, with job advancements. An illegal trial of 6 jurors took place and was presided by the father of an attorney who the Appellant removed from a personal injury case due to his abuse and deliberately not helping her get workers comp and more, after a man ran into her car, causing her to have a severe concussion when she had previously had a severe head injury from being hit by a 20 ton sander truck on a clear day when the roads were even bare, yet he used a spotter to help him prepare to hit her as she was coming over a hill. Why does any of this matter? It matters due to the only virus that exists in this nation is one of organized crime right within the government and those who are attached to the government (also known as Deep State and Shadow Government)
c) Attorney Russo enjoyed conspiring with Judge Bruce Levin by appealing an acquittal - which is only rarely allowed on murder cases when Congress is involved to allow it! He cited a caselaw which was frauded - and no doubt why that caselaw is not reported in the abusive case against the Appellant! He cited State V Joseph Alexander James - and though Appellant had little time to act on it, she had to go to the law library and find out what was on file and what was relayed in the system. According to the frauded record, they claimed he was arrested for delivering marijuana or hash to an individual at Harchrome, which is where he worked for over 13 years by then and he raised a family in Connecticut. The whole case was a sham, he said. And his wife said. They did nothing to the individual who got the package. A West Hartford police officer dressed up as a FedEx delivery man without FedEx’s permission. He had this uniform in his office for whenever he wanted to use it.
i. The trial judge dismissed the case against Mr. James, who was born in Jamaica yet had been a citizen of USA for many years and his wife had a beauty shop in Hartford.
ii. Attorney Russo and Judge Levin just figured they could get away with their lies. Upon realizing things were not adding up regarding Mr. James being incarcerated for 48 months, Appellant went to Hartford, CT to get the court file from the very court he had to appear in. The information was indeed frauded due to the lies not being consistent. Apparently one frauder altered records in one location and another frauder altered records at that court location.
iii. Appellant went to see Mrs. James at her beauty shop, and had a pleasant visit with her. She said her husband had never been arrested before that. He was just doing his job, getting a package from shipping and receiving department, which went to an employee. The judge who dismissed the case had an untimely heart attack. There was nothing more of the case. Yet on record the courts frauded that it was appealed and he was convicted and incarcerated - all lies.
iv. The lies on Cardinal Hill v Anne Bradley are frauded records. Appellant was poisoned with lead and other matter in her water. She had it tested. She saw a doctor at Gaylord Hospital for a sleep study test. The doctor said that her sleep problems were secondary to her heart problems and she needed to see a cardiologist asap. Appellant’s part-time employer, RGIS Inventory Systems, assured her she would be in a safe work environment due to her need to be hydrated and in a cool place. Instead, they turned off the air conditioning and deprived her of water. She had a heart attack the following day, being abused at the hospital even though the paramedics told her she was having a heart attack. One doctor wanted her admitted since the machine kept beeping and she was having numerous tachycardias as well. The other doctor said he didn’t want to get involved since this was caused by the landlord - having lead in her water, and also caused by her employer. He wanted her to go home and she said, “Fine. I don’t want you killing me anyway.” And she remained home for a month, struggling just to get groceries and she was quite sick for months yet had to get back to work. There is more to this dynamic yet focusing on the frauded appeal by Kevin Russo and Judge Bruce Levin, they continued down their rabbit hole of lies and legal malpractice - despite the Appellant even citing laws which indicated NO APPEAL OF AQUITTAL.
v. Kevin Russo just was out to get revenge for Lawrence Mark Hurley, who got caught - not by anything which the Appellant did - it was what HE did - he framed himself and the courts went to all measures to cover up his career of crime! After all, it proved that the Milford Court was fudging records to cover up his continuous embezzling, and apparently when he got his chemical out to remove signatures from checks, the prosecutors just figured he was doing his nails! It is not professionalism that wins in this state - it is organized crime - which is why Enron was so convoluted and seemingly protected from accountability for years until it collapsed! The nefarious closing of well-known gun manufactors helped them increase illegal gun deals!
1. Janet Peckinpaw received prestigious media awards for doing a series on Kumar Viswanthan, who was convicted of murder. SHE claimed he murdered someone who raped his sister, caring nothing about what was actually reported years before that - and the DOC enjoyed covering it up more by shutting down access to prison records. Certain people inside the system just had to get they hype by frauding - when there was really nothing to be gained; and there never is when lies are pancaked. Appellant offered to get information on him by checking the microfiche at the West Hartford Library before she went home. It came as a complete surprise that Kumar Viswanithan had shot a man in cold blood at a Hartford park, right in daylight - all because an illegal gun deal resulte in a gun not working. Janet Peckinpaw was literally getting her hype by deliberately lying about the whole situation and death threats were coming through the fax machine which is where Appellant was working, the Public Information Office. Upon discovering the truth on that reporting scheme of lies, Appellant’s car was greatly damaged, costing her almost $1000 in repair due to a mechanic destroying her air conditioner - or most likely stealing it from her and replacing it with another. Gilberto claimed to be certified, he was referred to the Appellant by a state employee who was involved with rehabilitating offenders of all types. She met him at the local YMCA/YWCA and stopped going there after that horrible experience. He seemed so personable and sincere.
2. As a result of “outing” Kevin Russo and Judge Levin by disclosing the real facts of the case to both Appellate and Supreme Court, after unsuccessfully motioning they remove the case from the books due to all the illegal twists and turns it took, Kevin Russo just kept right at it and by doing so he climbed right to the top but being a judge at Danbury, CT - which were avid advocators of the Sandy Hook Shooting fraud, among other things - such as the fraud by Hoops & Associates, not even using attorneys in court!
2. Joseph Alexander James was deported back to Jamaica, thanks to the covering up of Richard Blumenthal and Kevin Russo and Judge Levin, and no doubt Lawrence Mark Hurley - to name a few! It is unknown where his wife is, where he is - maybe they also made sure he conveniently died of an untimely heart attack as well!
18. The illicit arrest by stalking police at 360 State Street in 2016, cannot be found in the records at the law library, through Westlaw. It was either that or whoever may have hacking the computer she was on (they allow judges to do that there) wanted to hide the case so they could fraud it up and make it more manageable, believable, and so forth. She was not only assaulted by Trooper Jon Naples, but further abused by the courts when there was no merit to the case. Trooper Naples and his buddy trooper reported that Court Service Center clerk Lori Semrau called them from the courthouse and told them to arrest Appellant. Yet they stalked Appellant for 40 minutes in the lobby, waiting for the Bozzuto employee, Karem Singh, to tell them when Anne Bradley was leaving her apartment, and meantime Dragana LaCore called all tenants on that floor to stay inside due to Appellant Anne Bradley being a dangerous person - yet Trooper Napels did not get away with shooting her that day as she was taking out her trash. He tried to encourage her to run when she saw them leave the elevator, look at her and then walk down the other side of the hallway. She did not run. She had no expectation they were there to go after her. They had hyped themselves up for 40 minutes into an elvated euphoria expected to shoot her as she rushed back to her apartment, obviously. That plot did not work and she was forced in prison for 6 days awaiting a preliminary hearing which was delayed and against the law. Because she called FBI Agent Aldenburg regarding this illicit arrest and assault, he monitored the situation. He was able to get a DOC official to not allow her to go to a cell which they PLANNED for her. And the woman who did go in that cell was murdered - strangled and it was reported she hung herself which was a complete impossibility.
19. It really doesn’t matter how much trauma the Appellant has gone through here in Connecticut. What matters is, why she is not dead yet from all the times they have tried to kill her!
20. This concludes the supplement of Facts for Objection to Terminate Stay of Execution, which for all intense purposes is completely illegal for the Hoops & Associates attorneys to pursue, yet they have great support from Kevin Russo, et al who care nothing about serving the public; they only care about serving the organized crime.
APPENDIX ATTACHED
“Caselaw” on State v Bradley (originating 6/16/2006) as well as cited law by Kevin Russo, State v Joseph Alexander James.
Prepared and Submitted,
THE APPELLANT, PRO SE
_______________________
Anne M. Bradley
IllegalEviction2024
PO Box 206514
New Haven, CT 0652
Phone: 203-508-0858
CERTIFICATION
THIS Supplement to Objection to Motion To Terminate Automatic Stay of Execution, COMPRISES OF 17 PAGES, ALONG WITH AN APPENDIX AS DESCRIBED. It is Pursuant to P.B. §§ 62-7 and 66-3, it is hereby certified that a copy of the foregoing was sent electronically or by USPS mail this 13th day of July, 2026, to the following Attorneys who are listed by the Appellate Court:
Lloyd L. Langhammer (Appellate)
JURIS NO. Is oddly different than older trial case of AC 48416 appearance
Appearance is illegal as Pro Hac Vice
LAW OFFICES OF LLOYD L. LANGHAMMER, LLC
18A Granite Street
New London, CT 06320
860-440-3340 NO FAX NUMBER FOUND ON RECORD
HOOPS & ASSOCIATES
19A THAMES STREET
GROTON, CT 06340
PHONE: 860-445-8911
FAX: 860-445-8919
___Illegal Eviction 2024
Anne M. Bradley, Pro Se
The aforesaid supplement by the Appellant in aforesaid case has been diligently prepared to the best of her ability, contending with cyber crime as a common issue.
Appellant has an e-services account and has been verified by e-services - which for all intense purposes was nefariously run by Elizabeth Bozzuto, Chief Administrative Judge who enjoyed abusing her power whenever and wherever she had opportunity. The 2016 arrest was also intended to bring fame and fortune to their conglomerate of corruption, especially if Trooper Naples got away with murdering her out in the hallway for Dragana LaCore, et al. Dragana was on the payroll of Bozzutos. The crime money they have to reflect an $89 billion mortgage for a $2.6 billion building purchased just over the Satanic sales price of 3/65 - which was 4/65ths, $160 million - is obviously feeding a lot of corruption in and out of this state, since Gideon Freedman is located in New York City. And this is what results when a person has been so greatly abused in the state which she lives and and can’t afford to get out of. Will this corruption continue and they will get their lawmakers to cook up more lies and laws to harm her? Of course. Including attempting to force her at the Animal Farm at Yale New Haven Hospital, to remove her from THEIR crime-infested society so they can continue their hypes.
Appellant is seeking this to be notarized to validate that she has spelled her name correctly.
________________________
Anne M. Bradley
IllegalEviction2024
Comments