AC48416 Motion For Judicial Notice

 I have to paste this quickly, this is not finished: 

link to this blogpost:  https://publiusroots.blogspot.com/2025/12/ac48416-motion-for-judicial-notice.html

validate:  

https://publiusroots.blogspot.com/2025/12/ac48416-motion-for-judicial-notice.html

AC 48416

NHH-CV24-6024196-S :      APPELLATE COURT OF CT

 

ANSONIA STATE

STREET :       STATE OF CONNECTICUT

 

V :              HOUSING SESSION

 

ANNE M. BRADLEY   :                      December 8,  2025

 

APPELLANT-DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE PURSUANT TO PB 60-3

Appellant-Defendant moves this court for judicial notice pursuant to PB 60-3.

 

HISTORY

This case arose from the trial court’s failure to apply the law to an unjust Eviction Case, claiming she did not pay rent for August and September of 2024 when she proved she had.  Summons was hung on her door knob either the evening of October 23 or the morning of October 24, 2024 - which Appellant-Defendant also argued that was the common area and whoever placed it there did not ring her doorbell or knock on her door.   Plaintiff had not paid for this Summons and  therefore failed to provide docket number on the case.  The Chief Clerk also failed to docket the case for a week, which caused the Appellant-Defendant to file her appearance on October 24, 2024 and thereafter submit her Answer and Special Defenses.  Upon vefifying her rent checks were deposited by the landlord, the Appellant discovered they only cashed July, August, and September 2024 checks despite having an account with the same bank, Bank of America.  Appellant-Defendant attempted to file a cross claim on this summary process, yet the housing court claimed no cross-claims were allowed.  She therefore filed a housing omplaint, which was a very stressful and time-consuming project and referrred to the Housing Eviction Case, Ansonia State Street v Anne M. Bradley.  Her housing issues  have been longstanding, spanning over 13 years, and she listed several defendants including BOZZUTO COMPANIES (since all employees at 360 State Street were their employees, the Obama Administration issued an agreement with Bozzutos upon granting them millions of dollars of “funding”, to include having 50 apartments as Section 8 apartments, and they were inferred as the owners of 360 State Street, which they developed, yet no presence of  a title to this property was found in the real estate records and this contract which Bozziutos made with the federal government was removed from the record - all of which the Appellant-Defendant scanned in for her records yet her flash drives were stolen from her ) the City of New Haven Livable City Initiative and the housing authority, Elm City Communities, which includes a project titled “360 State Street”.  The first hearing of that case took place on October 31, 2024.  The woman presiding said she was Alayna Stone and the court recognized her as Alayna Stone, which was fraudulent since this woman was approximately 20 years older than Alayna Stone.  Additionally a young man appeared for Hoops & Associates and said he was Attorney Peter Hoops, yet he obviously was not born when Attorney Peter Hoops entered the BAR.  The real Alayna Stone appeared at the first hearing of the eviction case and made comments which reflected that she was being told what to say  and do and was not addressing the gravity of the situation, that the case had no merit since the rent was paid.  She was focused on evicting the Appellant-Defendant using tricks, including evading from Due Process of Law by ruling on motions without hearing them, to include getting objections from the Plaintiff on either case, except for what was claimed to be an inept objection, which the Appellant-Defendant motioned to strike since it was not prepared in accordance to legal practices.  Alayna Stone evicted the Appellant-Defendant at 10 am on a Friday, with a 3-day notice, which the Housing Court allows weekends, claiming it is a straight 3-day notice.  Additionally, this order was not uploaded until the afternoon, which the Appellant-Defendant claimsed was a typical trick since they knew through cyber crime that she had checked the status of the case at about 10:30 am and there was no change.  She was unable to call the court to verify since the CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE, ELIZABETH BOZZUTO, also pancaked another trick, making all calls go to a Centralized Processing Unit and not allowing her to speak to anyone at the courthouse; namely, Lisa, or Courtney, or Yvanna to verifiy the case status.  

It was not until after 5pm that she discovered that they evicted her and the chief clerk deliberately failed to call her to let her know, despite uploading the order later in the day and also making that day count as Day One since the order was issued in the morning.  It was the conclusion of the Appellant-Defendant that not only was Alayana Stone participating in fraudulent actions, she was obviously not even an attorney.  Her juris number did not exist in the Juris lookup and she is only shown to have have worked for the Secretary of State and possibly the Attorney General in the State of Connecticut.  Appellant=Defendant brought all these issues up in her pleadings, fully aware that the the recordings of hearings is altered by malware before the court reporter prepares the transcripts.  She had submitted requests to remove the malware in order for the court reporter to proceed with typing transcripts, particularly since Judge Stone made her pay for transcripts in trial court despite the fact she knew the Appellant-Defendant would appeal if necessary, to ascert her rights.  The court denied these requests and motions.  

Today, the Appellant-Defendant is submitting a letter to the housing authority as well as this motion for judicial notice due to the fact that the court has consp